Categories
AI

You can’t see me!

“You can’t see me” is the famous catchphrase and hand gesture of WWE legend John Cena, where he waves his hand in front of his face

John started it as a joke dance with his younger brother who did to a hip-hop beat, meaning his rivals were not on his level. It turned into a huge internet meme that he is invisible.

If you’re a WWE fan like me, you’re probably humming the tune to the song right now.

I thought of John Cena recently, not because of his wrestling accreditations, but more so of him being invisible and his opponents not being able to see him.

The BBC recently reported that a Sainsbury’s store in London, which is using AI to identify unwanted customers has recently made some mistakes! The software identified one gentleman as someone who should be escorted of the premises. So as he was going about doing his normal shopping, he went to the self-checkout and then two store managers said to him that he’s got to leave.

Shocked is an understatement.

He left, raised it up with Sainsburys, who later said they had made a mistake. Well, it was them and their AI.

The company who has provided the AI face recognition said that the software does face recognition of people who have been shop lifting/stealing and/or caused trouble in a store. Now mistakes can happen. And then last step in their process is to have a human verify.

Let’s be honest, we humans at best, are no where near as good as machines.

So a mistake was made. Actually, this wasn’t the first time. As the story broke out, a lot more people came forward saying they had experienced something similar.

Sainsbury’s are not halting the roll out of their AI facial reconigiton system.

This got me thinking, a) what is the accuracy of the AI system (can they really see the face clearly or is this a John Cena moment? and b) human intervention – if this is meant to be the final sanity check before an action takes place, then why isn’t it working?

The process itself sounds logical, but the steps within don’t fill Sainbury’s with confidence.

So do we blame AI?

No. AI is just doing what it is being told. It has been given tasks, parameters, data, information, etc… and asked to go ahead and generate an output.

Is it the human?

Maybe. Should the human double check, verify and what capabilities does the human have to make the right decision?

Who do we blame?

The process.

The process should have ‘quality’ checks. If AI identifies a person, provides a high level percentage rate that it is them (against stored photos, data, etc…), then the human intervention should be to go to the person and talk to them. Could the human wear a camera that has a close up of the person which feeds back to the AI system to verify their original decision?

It comes down to confidence of the system.

I think it’s a matter of time before you will not need human intervention. AI will be able to do an initial check, close up check and continue to verify, up to the point where a decision is made with 99% confidence and then for a human to talk to the individual.

There’s more and more camera’s in more and more public spaces. Facial recognition is happening everywhere. Your face is on a computer somewhere with some tags of data.

What that data is, only you and the computer know.

Oh, and maybe AI will be using it for some purpose.

Wonder what AI would make of John Cena….

Categories
AI

… all that AI stuff?

There’s a few of us, that stand at a particular area of the bar, having a few drinks, catching up on what has been happening during the week and talking about anything and everything really.

Someone asked me, Bal… what is it that you really do? I know you’re in IT, but do you fix computers or do all that AI stuff?

That made me smile, ‘all that AI stuff’.

I asked him, what you make of AI?

He said, ‘well… I keep hearing it’s going to take over everything, it’s going to be doing things where people won’t be required to do and take over their jobs’.

Everyone nodded in agreement. They’d all heard the same narrative.

At this moment in time, I had two options. Let them know that a) yes, AI will do tasks of those who code, and other such tasks. In fact, there’s alot AI can do. It’s intelligence… or b) drop a few truths that it’s not as bad as they think.

‘So, I’m primarily responsible for developing strategies linked to priorities and goals, long term plans, PMO (Program Management Office), vendor and partner relations, governance, compliance and much more… but, if you do want your computer looking at, I’ll give it a go!’

We all chuckled. And then the topic veered onto how England were losing to Scotland in the Six Nations.

The whole area of IT is huge. From fixing someone’s computer to strategy. And I then thought that, IT isn’t just one function. It’s within functions. And that’s the part where everyone is a ‘tech person’. You can have HR Tech, Finance Tech (FinTech), etc… IT is not one standalone function it used to be. It’s advanced to product mindset and capability thinking.

And as everyone reads about what AI is doing and going to do, it’s time for everyone to learn, or at least grasp the basics, of AI. Even if it’s just using ChatGPT to help them with whichever industry they are in.

I need some low maintenance shrubs. ChatGPT helped me.

I need to sort my holiday out. Guess what. ChatGPT can help you.

Now, as I went onto my second drink (Guinness 0.0%), it’s there to help. Not to own, take over and do for you (though, that is happening in some areas with guard rails — AI Agents). All of this, got me thinking as Scotland were forgetting about their match against Italy and beating England… what is the AI narrative to the average Joe?

What I do know for now is that, we’ll continue to meet up at the pub every Saturday for a drink or two and talk about all sorts of topics. I can see the AI topic coming up again. I can see the rugby six nations topic coming up again. I can see the question, ‘what do you do in IT Bal’ topic coming up again. But that’s good! Because the more we talk, the more we understand and the more we can have a desire to learn.

Final score, Scotland 31–20.

Categories
AI

How not to use AI

All the talk is about AI.

To be fair, it’s transformational.

Alot of industries are being disrupted. A number of roles/jobs/occupations will be replaced with the use of AI.

You might be thinking, but Bal… we’ll need journalists, right?

Maybe. We’ll need them to write good articles. They could use AI to research and/or refine their material. Ideally, not publish something that ChatGPT writes for you after a few prompts.

The issue is, everyone is jumping on the bandwagon without the right due diligence. And when you don’t carry out the right checks, your credibility falls. Significantly. How can you be then trusted?

And guess what. That just happened –

You might think you’ve saved time and outsmarted your team & workforce. Maybe you could have… if you’d checked your work.

Use AI to support you. Make sure the final output is your work. Especially if you’re in an industry where your reputation matters.